EMERGENCY AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
"Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena, quem quer passar além do Bojador tem de passar além da Dor"
in Fernando Pessoa
INTRODUÇÃO
No âmbito de uma equipa de exelência aqui fica:
Segurança e monitorização da via aérea em pacientes emergentes é a chave para Qualidade de vida no ege da nossa actuação - A PESSOA HUMANA. A protecção cerebral órgão que comanda o organismo é fulcral, mas este precisa de oxigénio, glicose, e irrigação sanguínea para SOBREVIVER, quanto maior for o tempo de exposição a factores agressivos e stressants para o organismo, maior será o grau de incapacidade para a PESSOA, o que limitará o seu quotidiano e em casos extremos a vai levar a uma nova aprendizagem de adaptação ao seu micro e macrossitema que é único e diferente para cada um de nós.
Estes quadros baseiam-se no livro de Andreas Thierbach and Tim Piepho, que são do corpo de profissionais do do Johannes Gutenberg University, Hospital Mainz, Germany: University Professor Christian Werner, MD., este livro pode pedir-se por mail para: Endopress@t-online.de , Thierbach@uni-mainz.de , Piepho@anaesthesie.klinik.uni-mainz.de , Phone: 0049 61 31/71_ Phone 0049 74 61/1 45 90
PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING THE AIRWAYS WITH REGARD TO POTENCIAL DIFFICULTIES
a) Brief, specific history (e.g., known intubation problems, surgery of the face, mouth, or neck, tumors of the upper respiratory tract)
b) Evaluation of physiognomy
c) Testing of maximum active mouth opening
d) Inspection of the neck, testing of cervical spine mobility (be careful in patients with suspected cervical spine trauma)
e) Basic dental status
f) Inspection on the oral cavity and mesopharynx
g) Clinical screening tests (e.g. the Mallampati test, Patil test)
DEFENITE SIGNS OF POTENCIAL INTUBATION PROBLEMS:
a) Decreased mobility of the cervical spine
b) Micriogenia
c) Mouth opening less than 2cm
d) Ankylosis of the TMJ
e) Extreme macroglossia
f) Severe rheumatoid spondylitis
g) Malformation syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome)
e) Scrarring (especially after tumor surgery, burns, and irradiation)
f) Advanced stage of rheumatoid arthritis
g) Epiglottitis
h) Tumors obstructing the airway
SUGGESTIVE SIGNS OF POTENCIAL INTUBATION PROBLEMS
Alpha) Prior history of difficult intubation
Beta) Progenia
Gamma) Retrogenia
Delta) Limited mouth opening
Épsilon) Protruding upper incisors
Digama) Loose incisors
Zeta) Missing teeth
Etá) High, narrow palate
Tehta) Moderate macroglossia or restrict mobility of the tongue
Iota)High position of the larynx
Kappa) Limited movement of the cervical spine or TMJ
Lambda) Bull neck and nuchal masses
Miu) Facial and neck injuries (e.g., midfacial fractures)
Nu) Obesity or a short, thick neck
Hetá) Foreign bodies in the upper respiratory tract
Sampi)Trapped or buried patients
PATIENT - AND ENVIRONMENT - RELATED FACTORS IN SLECTING A PROCEDURE FOR SECURING THE ARWAY
PATIENT - RELATED FACTORS
- Urgency of the situation
- Age and height
- General condition of the patient
- Special anatomical and pathophysiologic
ENVIRONMENT - RELATED FACTORS
- Availability of personnel
- Level of training and individual experiense of personnel
- Availability of necessary equipment
- Light, temperature and weather conditions
THECNIQUES FOR REDUCING GASTRIC INSUFLATION
DURING MASK VENTILATION
Apply
cricoid pressure by the Sellick maneuver
Reduce
inspiratory flow by prolonging the ventilation stroke to 1.0-1.5 seconds
Avoid
CPAP and PEEP
Limit
the tidial volume during oxygen delivery to barely visible chest excursions
Immediately
correct any airway obstruction
DISADVANTAGES OF MASK VENTILATION DURING
CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION
Chest
compressions are less efficient, since they must be synchronized with the
bag-and-mask ventilation
Bronchial
toilet and endobronchial medications cannot be applied
Decreased
pulmonary compliance during chest compressions leads to a rise in airway
pressure and further increases the risk in airway pressure and further
increases the risk of gastric insufflation.
ADVANTAGES OF ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION OVER MASK
VENTILATION
Secure
ventilation with airway pressures adjusted to the patient
Optimum
protection against aspiration
Option
of endobronchial application of medications (e.g. epinephrine, lidocaine,
atropine, naloxone)
Allows
for bronchial toilet
GENERAL INDICATIONS FOR THE INTUBATION OF
EMERGENCY PATIENTS
-
Resuscitation
-
Severe
dyspnea or respiratory depression
-
Multiply
injured patient
-
Head-injured patient
-
Patients
with a high risk of aspiration
MEASURES TO FACILITATE INTUBATION IN DIFFICULT
SITUATIONS
-
Place
the head in the modified Jackson Position (“sniffing position”)
-
Have
an assistant apply pressure to the cricoid
-
Perform
the BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver to move the larynx
closer to the visual axis of the intubator
-
Select
a tube with a 0.5 to 1.0 mm smaller inside diameter
-
Bend
the tube into a “hockey stick” shape with a stylus
-
Advance
the stylus until projects 1-2 cm past the tip of the tube
-
Use
a laryngoscope blade with a different shape or size
UNRELIABLE TESTS AND INDICATORS FOR CHECKING
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE PLACEMENT
-
Bilateral
auscultation of the chest (first apical, then basal)
-
Auscultation
of the epigastrium
-
Observation
of equal chest excursions on both sides
-
Condensation
of expiratory air during initial expiration in the endotracheal tube
FAIRLY RELIABLE METHODES OF VERIFYING
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE POSITION
-
Capnography
or capnometry
-
Esophageal
detector device (EDD)
RELIABLE PROCEDURES FOR CHECKING ENDOTRACHEAL
TUBE PLACEMENT
-
Direct
laryngoscopy (tube is visible between the vocal cords)
-
Flexible
intubation fiberscope and BONFILS
intubation fiberscope (to detect tracheal cartilage rings and
demonstrate the tracheal bifurcation)
Comentários
Enviar um comentário